I was just on Mrbrown’s blog and saw his post on the Democracy no need opposition one, says PAP member and “That essential journey” article. I had a quick read of the article and I’ll admit now, I have to follow Mrbrown on this one.
Just as much as there is a need to have an efficient system this shouldn’t be a point to sideline our engagement process or the voice of the opposition.
A vocal opposition when providing just, balanced and logical arguments should be something to listen to. For every policy, there is always a two sides of a coin, we need to be aware of both sides and it can help when we have a second eye on the issues. It isn’t about how vocal opposition automatically translates into better governance, but it’s really about the process and the ability to utilize balanced opposition views to translate them into developing better policies.
Personally, I think we are definitely in position to be bright enough to take in different voices and opinions when there are good ideas being exchanged. The presence of more NCMPs should improve parliamentary debates precisely because they are present to provide other balanced views and meaningful political debate.
Opposing views for good administrations, such as Obama’s has strengthen their leadership rather than soften it by the mere fact that they brings out plans that will help the people directly and used the criticism to shape better policies if necessary. I think the American public and policy makers are trying to deal with a matter that is unprecedented and have big consequences for whichever choice they make. The debates act as catalyst to picking out effective criticism and working to improve the system.
However, the American system is rather complex and has different influences to deal with, which cannot just be looked at superficially as many opposing views being shouted in Congress.
Additionally, the increase of NMPs I believe is a good step to increasing the variety of debate and ensure quality candidates. Afterall, I believe that Parliament has a vigorous selection process to making nomination of NMPs, which can at least guarantee some form of commitment and stature of the NMPs.
Take for example, NMP Siew Kum Hong who in my opinion did well in voicing his opinions and those of interest groups in parliament. Mr. Siew provided balanced ideas, voiced his opinions and gave credit to policies where he believed it was due.
The need of a system that evolves with the people’s aspiration and the country’s need is being met, with these recent changes of more opposition voice in parliament is a timely and a good way of having more people involved in the policy making process, as we set to reinforce our commitment as an inclusive society.
Leon is an opinionated student, loves to be with people and enjoys contemplating about everything under the sun. He is restless and is always looking for every opportunity to travel to see the world. At 16, he ventured off to Trieste, Italy for his pre-university, embracing the wonderful Mediterranean culture. In Italy, he was also a conflict resolution facilitator, working on youth engagement in Europe. He volunteers regularly for youth development to support ways to seek social change. On the side, Leon is an avid fan of the series Mythbusters, is a facebook addict and a food fanatic.